Home
Blaque's Blog of Horrors - Bear Today, Gone Tommorow
"Horror And Moral Terror Are Your Friends"
jblaque
[info]jblaque
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
Bear Today, Gone Tommorow

(Hat-tip Kos)

This is a perfect example of why - even though I'm a gun owner (and occasional hunter) - I will never be an NRA member:

At the moment, it's illegal to hunt Polar bears in the United States. However, in some parts of Canada, wealthy US hunters pay $30,000 or more for a guided hunt to get their chance at killing this endangered animal.

During the 1970s, these bears were hunted down to a few thousand. Their numbers made a comeback during the 80s and early 90s, but in 1994, the U.S. passed legislation to allow American hunters to import Polar bears killed in Canada for the first time since 1972. Since the change took effect, at least 838 polar bear permits have been issued, with sixty-three additional applications pending this year.

Fortunately, the bears have found a friend in Sen. Jack Reed (D-RI). A measure by Reed to prevent trophy hunters from killing polar bears abroad and bringing their heads and hides back to the United States was recently approved by a key Senate panel. Reed agrees that the bears are rapidly becoming an endangered species, and that global warming has made the bears - marine mammals who depend on sea ice for survival - even more vulnerable.

"We cannot regulate hunting in other nations, but we can help stop the slaughter of these animals by not allowing polar bear imports into the United States," Reed said in a statement. "With the increased threat of global warming, it is essential that we take action to protect these animals."

So, a senator introduces a bill to block import of trophies taken from an endangered species fighting loss of habit and changing climate - an animal that is already protected in the United States. Seems fairly reasonable, yes?

Now, let's go to the NRA for their traditional, "slippery slope" response:

"Legislation in Congress, backed by extreme animal rights groups, would end the process that allows U.S. hunters to import polar bears they sport-hunted in Canada back to the U.S. While few hunters ever have the opportunity to pursue polar bears, all sportsmen must have their voices heard in this critical matter because this is simply one more step in the anti-hunting lobby's effort to incrementally ban all hunting. If they are allowed to prevail regarding the emotional ban on polar bear imports, they will move on to more commonly-hunted game."

And here you thought those poor drowning bear cubs were sad. Mean old Senator Reed is denying folks the pleasure of killing these bears before they're gone. Polar bears today. Quail tomorrow. Pretty soon, it'll be illegal to shoot old lawyers in the face.

Too bad the NRA doesn't have the same sensible attitude as some of the polar bear hunters:

"Fulcher, who just received his permit to import the 29-year-old male polar bear he killed last year, agreed: "Stopping hunting is not going to bring their habitat back. It's gone anyway. Global warming is happening, but it's from urbanization - not hunting."

See? They're going do die anyway, so why not shoot them and get some fun out of it?

Tags: , , , , ,
From: Chicago
Mood: Assholes

Comments
glenmarshall From: [info]glenmarshall Date: June 27th, 2007 08:33 pm (UTC) (Permalink)
Using that same faulty logic, perhaps our servicemen can come home with the scalps of terrorists they have killed.
black_reign From: [info]black_reign Date: June 27th, 2007 09:35 pm (UTC) (Permalink)
That picture is the reason why I don't feel bad when I hear some Polar Bear ripped a guy's nads off.

That is a very sad picture
black_reign From: [info]black_reign Date: June 27th, 2007 09:39 pm (UTC) (Permalink)
Stopping hunting is not going to bring their habitat back. It's gone anyway. Global warming is happening, but it's from urbanization - not hunting."

so it's urbanization and not bullets.

man do you have to HIGH to come up with bullshit like this?
jblaque From: [info]jblaque Date: June 28th, 2007 03:06 am (UTC) (Permalink)
Actually, you have to be low to come up with this bullshit.

Extremely low.
black_reign From: [info]black_reign Date: June 28th, 2007 05:15 am (UTC) (Permalink)
Yeah that's true, what I meant is do you have to be HIGH to even be able to sink that low and if you do, HOW HIGH? I mean I've been HIGH before (Clinton high, not Bush high) and there's no way I can think of saying shit like this.
reality_hammer From: [info]reality_hammer Date: June 28th, 2007 12:15 am (UTC) (Permalink)
How is this different from a pro-abortion "slippery slope" argument?
kierthos From: [info]kierthos Date: June 28th, 2007 02:16 am (UTC) (Permalink)
You know what? If you and all the other pro-lifers are so pro-life, why don't you adopt a kid that's very cold, and alone, and unloved?
jblaque From: [info]jblaque Date: June 28th, 2007 03:03 am (UTC) (Permalink)
You'd think old Hammer would have some room in his freezer for a few hundred frozen embryos at least, now wouldn't you?
saint_boner From: [info]saint_boner Date: June 28th, 2007 01:11 am (UTC) (Permalink)
None of my weapons are registered so I wouldn't join the NRA because then my name would be on a list of gun owners. I don't join anything.
9 comments or Make a Comment
Profile
Jonathan Blaque
User: [info]jblaque
Name: Jonathan Blaque
Calendar
Back July 2009
1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031
Tags
Page Summary
Links